Alternative Fuels: The Path to Net-Zero Emissions in Shipping

Charting a sustainable course for emissions reduction in the maritime industry.

Introduction: Why The Shipping Industry Needs a Fuel Rethink

A cornerstone of global trade, the shipping industry is projected to expand by 2.4% annually through 2029 (UNCTAD). Yet, this growth carries an environmental toll, accounting for 3% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. While oil-based fuels have dominated maritime operations for over a century, surging energy demands now render this model unsustainable. Global regulators, such as the IMO and EU, are implementing stringent net-zero mandates by 2050 to counter this trajectory.

With mounting pressure to decarbonize, operators must urgently transition to compliant solutions. The strategic adoption of alternative fuels emerges as the critical pathway forward. Proactive investment in clean energy technologies - from green methanol to ammonia - promises dual rewards: future-proofing fleets against regulatory shifts while maintaining competitiveness in an evolving market. Early movers will not only meet tightening environmental policies but also secure operational efficiency and long-term profitability as the industry pivots toward sustainability.

Global energy trends reveal a heavy fossil fuel reliance, highlighting the need to chart a course toward cleaner alternatives.

Source: Ourworldindia

The Regulatory Catalyst: Decarbonization Regulations and Why They Matter

The first step towards effective decarbonization through alternative fuels is to understand why these green fuels and alternative energy sources are the most effective strategies for complying with the various regulations introduced for maritime decarbonization. A mix of regional and global regulations is driving the shipping industry’s transition to net-zero emissions. Below are the most significant maritime decarbonization regulations, their mandates, and how they are reshaping operations for industry stakeholders.

1. FuelEU Maritime

A European Union regulation mandates reductions in the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of fuels used by ships operating in EU waters.

Targets/Goals:

• Achieve an 80% reduction in GHG intensity by 2050 compared to 2020.
• Mandatory use of onshore power supply (OPS) in designated European ports starting in 2030.

Timeline:

• Full application commenced on January 1, 2025.
• The first compliance reports are due in early 2026.
• GHG intensity targets tighten at 5-year intervals through 2050.

Key Insights:

• Focus: Mandates GHG intensity cuts (80% by 2050) and the adoption of Onshore Power Supply (OPS) in EU ports.
• Urgency: Tightening 5-year compliance cycles (2025-2050) requires immediate action.

Stakeholder Impact::

• Shipowners/Operators: Required to adopt low-carbon fuels and technologies, potentially increasing operational costs.
• Fuel Suppliers: Need to invest in the production and supply of renewable and low-carbon fuels.
• Ports: Must develop and implement the OPS infrastructure.
• Regulatory Bodies: Responsible for monitoring compliance and enforcing regulations.

2. 2023 IMO GHG Strategy

The International Maritime Organization has unveiled an updated strategy to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from international shipping.

Targets/Goals:

• Reduce the carbon intensity of international shipping by at least 40% by 2030 compared to 2008 levels.
• Achieve net-zero GHG emissions by or around 2050.
• Increase uptake of zero or near-zero GHG emission technologies to at least 5% by 2030.

Timeline:

• Adopted in July 2023.
• Review and update scheduled for 2028.

Key Insights:

• Global Alignment: Targets a 40% reduction in carbon intensity by 2030 and net-zero emissions by 2050.
• Innovation Push: Requires 5% adoption of zero-emission fuels by 2030.

Stakeholder Impact:

• Shipowners/Operators: Will have to invest in energy-efficient technologies and alternative fuels.
• Technology Providers: Opportunity to develop and supply innovative solutions.
• Governments: Must implement supportive policies and infrastructure.
• Environmental Organizations: Monitor progress and advocate for stronger measures to address environmental concerns.

3. IMO Net-Zero Framework (MARPOL Annex VI Chapter 5)

The IMO introduced a regulatory framework to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from international shipping.

Targets/Goals:

• Implement a global carbon pricing mechanism with a levy of $100 per ton of CO₂ equivalent emissions.
• Establish a new fuel standard for ships.
• Create a Net-Zero Fund to support the transition and assist climate-vulnerable countries.

Timeline:

• Approved during MEPC 83 in April 2025.
• Final adoption scheduled for October 2025.
• Entry into force expected in 2027.

Key Insights :

• Global Carbon Pricing: $100/ton CO₂ levy shifts economics toward green fuels.
• Net-Zero Fund: Supports developing nations and climate-vulnerable regions.

Stakeholder Impact:

• Shipowners/Operators:Obligated to comply with new fuel standards and carbon pricing.
• Fuel Suppliers: Required to provide fuels that meet new standards.
• Ports: Infrastructure may need to be implemented for new fuels.
• Governments:Tasked with enforcing regulations and managing the Net-Zero Fund.

4. Regional Decarbonization Regulations

Various national and regional regulations are aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping.

Targets/Goals:

• United Kingdom: Reduce domestic shipping emissions by 30% by 2030, 80% by 2040, and achieve net-zero by 2050.
• United States: Implement the Sustainable Maritime Fuel Grand Challenge to accelerate the adoption of clean fuels.
• Asia-Pacific: Develop green shipping corridors and support the adoption of alternative fuels.

Timeline:

• United Kingdom: Net-zero target by 2050.
• United States: Grand Challenge launched in 2025.
• Asia-Pacific: Ongoing development of green shipping corridors.

Key Insights:

• Shipowners/Operators: Obligated to comply with new fuel standards and carbon pricing.
• Fuel Suppliers: Required to provide fuels that meet new standards.
• Ports: Infrastructure may need to be implemented for new fuels.
• Governments: Tasked with enforcing regulations and managing related transition efforts.

Stakeholder Impact:

• Shipowners/Operators: Must comply with national regulations and invest in clean technologies.
• Fuel Suppliers: Opportunities to supply alternative fuels in emerging markets.
• Ports: Required to develop infrastructure to support new fuels and technologies.
• Regulatory Bodies: Responsible for implementing and enforcing regional regulations.

Overall Insights

The interplay of these regulations across national and international lines carries many implications for global shipping stakeholders. The overlapping effects of these regulations must be understood thoroughly to ensure that vessel operations adapt to these policies effectively.

1. Cost Pressures:

• Compliance costs (e.g., FuelEU fines, IMO carbon levy) could raise shipping rates by significantly by 2030.[9][10]
• Small operators risk bankruptcy without access to green financing.

2. Fuel Transition Risks:

• Ammonia/Hydrogen: Safety concerns and infrastructure gaps delay adoption.
• LNG: Short-term bridge fuel but faces phase-out due to methane slip.

3. Collaboration Imperative:

• Industry Alliances: Needed for R&D (e.g., Maersk-McKinsey Net-Zero Fund).
• Public-Private Partnerships: Vital for Port Upgrades and Green Corridors.

4. Regulatory Overlap:

• Ships operating globally must comply with EU ETS, IMO CII, and regional rules, increasing administrative burdens.

The major challenge is identifying alternative energy sources that will work best for maritime operations, considering their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, compatibility, and other relevant factors.

The Fuel Decision Tree: Mapping the Real Alternatives

As the maritime industry works to reduce its carbon footprint, selecting the right alternative fuel is crucial for compliance, cost-efficiency, and operational success. Understanding fuel options, GHG reduction potential, and infrastructure challenges will help shipowners navigate regulations, ensuring smooth fuel transition and maintaining profitability.

1. LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas)

LNG is a transitional fuel derived from natural gas, offering lower sulfur and particulate emissions than heavy fuel oil (HFO). While not zero-carbon, it reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by ~20% compared to HFO and can be blended with bio-LNG (methane derived from organic waste) for enhanced sustainability.

Metric	Data
GHG Reduction	20–30% (vs. HFO); up to 80% with bio-LNG
Readiness	High (mature technology, widely adopted)
Infrastructure	Mature (global bunkering network)
Safety/Regulations	Moderate (flammability risks, methane slip regulations tightening)

2. Biofuels (FAME, Bio-LNG)

Biofuels, produced from organic materials, are one of the most widely available alternative fuels for the maritime industry. They offer a carbon-neutral option that can be used in existing engines with minimal retrofitting. The primary types of biofuels include:

• FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Esters): Commonly used in marine engines, FAME is derived from vegetable oils and animal fats.
• Bio-LNG: A renewable version of LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) made from organic waste.

Metric	Data
GHG Reduction	50–95% (depends on feedstock lifecycle)
Readiness	Medium (limited by feedstock competition with aviation/energy sectors)
Infrastructure	Limited (growing production hubs in EU/U.S.)
Safety/Regulations	Moderate (existing standards for blends; certifications required)

3. Green Methanol

Green methanol is produced from biogenic waste (bio-methanol) or renewable hydrogen + captured CO₂ (e-methanol). It is a promising alternative fuel for shipping, offering an energy-dense option that can be used in both internal combustion engines and fuel cells.

Metric	Data
GHG Reduction	60–95% (net-zero with green production)
Readiness	Medium (engines operational; scaling production ongoing)
Infrastructure	Emerging (green corridors in EU/Asia; retrofits needed)
Safety/Regulations	Moderate (flammability/toxicity risks; IMO guidelines in place)

4. Ammonia

Ammonia is a fuel that produces zero CO2 emissions when burned, making it a strong contender for achieving net-zero emissions. It can be used in internal combustion engines and fuel cells. However, the toxicity of ammonia and the need for specialized handling and storage systems remain significant challenges.

Metric	Data
GHG Reduction	90–100% (if green hydrogen is used)
Readiness	Low (prototype engines; bunkering infrastructure lacking)
Infrastructure	Scarce (limited to fertiliser supply chains)
Safety/Regulations	High risk (toxic; IMO safety frameworks under development)

5. Hydrogen

Hydrogen offers zero emissions when burned, and its use in shipping is one of the most promising technologies for decarbonizing the sector. Hydrogen fuel cells are also being explored as an alternative to traditional combustion engines.

Metric	Data
GHG Reduction	95–100% (with green production)
Readiness	Low (fuel cells in R&D; storage barriers)
Infrastructure	Nascent (limited to pilot projects)
Safety/Regulations	High risk (flammability; no global bunkering standards)

6. Wind Propulsion Systems

Wind-assisted propulsion systems (WAPS) harness wind energy to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. Technologies include Flettner rotors, rigid sails, kites, and suction wings. These systems generate aerodynamic thrust, cutting fuel consumption by 5-25%, depending on vessel type and route optimization.

Metric	Data
GHG Reduction	5–25% (depending on system and operational conditions)
Readiness	Medium (growing adoption; 100+ installations expected by 2027)
Infrastructure	Limited (retrofit-focused; modular designs allow incremental upgrades)
Safety/Regulations	Moderate (IMO guidelines for EEXI/CII compliance; DNV standards in place)

Key Insights

• LNG and Biofuels are near-term solutions, but they face challenges related to methane slip and feedstock competition.
• Green Methanol balances readiness and emissions but requires carbon-negative supply chains.
• Ammonia and Hydrogen promise zero emissions, but they require massive infrastructure investments and robust safety protocols.
• Regulatory frameworks (e.g., IMO, FuelEU) are crucial for standardizing safety and incentivizing adoption.

Navigating Fuel Switching: Strategies for Existing and Future Ships

Shipowners must take proactive measures in preparing existing and future ships for the fuel transition:

• Existing Ships Retrofitting engines for biofuels or methanol, blending fuels for compliance, and integrating wind-assisted propulsion can ease transitions. Prioritize phased upgrades to align with infrastructure and regulations.
• Future Ships Designed with dual-fuel systems (ammonia/hydrogen-ready), advanced storage, and digital optimization, they’re built to adapt seamlessly to emerging green fuels and global standards

The Real Challenges Shipowners Face in 2025

The shipping industry faces significant challenges in decarbonizing, including complex regulations, fuel availability issues, and the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Here are the key hurdles:

1. Fuel Availability vs. Cost

• Challenge: Alternative fuels, such as green methanol and ammonia, offer long-term benefits but are expensive and scarce. Green methanol costs 2-3 times more than traditional fuels while production capacity is insufficient. Conventional fuels, such as VLSFO and MGO, remain dominant but are volatile and susceptible to geopolitical changes.
• Impact: Shipowners face a dilemma: investing in green fuels risks stranded assets if infrastructure lags, while sticking to fossil fuels invites higher penalties.

2. Compatibility with Current Vessel Technology

• Challenge: Retrofitting older vessels to use ammonia or hydrogen incurs significant costs and technical barriers. LNG retrofits also face concerns over methane slip, which can lead to penalties under stricter regulations.
• Impact: Older fleets risk obsolescence, with a significant number of existing LNG carriers potentially falling into non-compliant CII ratings by 2026, leading to costly upgrades or early scrapping. Hybrid solutions, like wind-assisted propulsion, offer modest savings but lack scalability.

3. Lack of Clarity on Long-Term Fuel Strategies

• Challenge:Regulatory uncertainty, such as the EU’s potential shift to well-to-wake emissions accounting, threatens to change the compliance landscape. For example, fossil methanol could become non-compliant if lifecycle emissions criteria tighten.
• Impact: Shipowners face uncertainty and risks in betting on unproven technologies. The early adoption of fuels like ammonia, which promises zero emissions, faces challenges such as a lack of bunkering infrastructure and safety concerns.

4. Balancing Short-Term Compliance vs. Long-Term ROI

• Challenge:The 2040 “tipping point” is approaching, where FuelEU penalties for fossil fuels may equal fuel prices. Short-term compliance might be cheaper, but delays can devalue assets.
• Impact: Smaller operators with limited capital face severe risks as EU ETS costs strain liquidity, while long-term fuel investments may lack guaranteed returns.

5. Geopolitical and Regulatory Fragmentation

• Challenge: Geopolitical tensions and OPEC+ policies disrupt fuel procurement, while the regulatory patchwork, including the EU ETS, FuelEU, and Asian-American regulations, creates conflicting compliance demands. Most ports lack infrastructure for green corridors.
• Impact: Localized price spikes from geopolitical instability and conflicting regulations force shipowners to overcomply or risk exclusion from key markets.

Shipowners and industry stakeholders are not only racing against time to reduce emissions but are also navigating rising costs and operational constraints in adopting alternative fuels.

Navigating the Transition: Advisory Steps for 2025 Readiness

As the shipping industry faces mounting pressure to meet net-zero emissions targets, developing a future-ready fuel strategy is essential for operational success and regulatory compliance. Proactive steps taken now can help shipowners prepare their fleets for 2025 and beyond.

Steps to Build a Future-Ready Fuel Strategy:

• Assess GHG Intensity Evaluate each vessel’s carbon emissions to identify areas for fuel switching and efficiency improvements.
• Evaluate Fuel-Switching Scenarios: Analyze the financial and operational implications of adopting alternative fuels, such as biofuels, green methanol, and ammonia.
• Monitor Fuel Supply Chains: Stay informed about global and regional fuel availability, and strengthen supplier relationships to ensure reliable sourcing.
• Track Regulatory Updates: Stay informed about the latest regulations from the IMO, FuelEU, and local authorities to ensure compliance.

By following these steps, shipowners can ensure smoother transitions, reduce operational risks, and align their fleets with future green fuel standards.

How Synergy Marine Group Supports You: Compliance, Clarity, Control

At Synergy Marine Group, we acknowledge the challenges of decarbonization and compliance with evolving global regulations. Our marine services solutions are crafted to address these real-world challenges, ensuring vessels remain efficient, compliant, and future-ready. By combining AI-driven analytics, regulatory expertise, and advanced tools, we provide the clarity and control shipowners need to navigate the decarbonization journey.

Azolla’s Contribution to Decarbonization

Marine Solutions' decarbonization and consulting arm, Azolla, offers a comprehensive decarbonization strategy and execution, including fuel selection, sustainability consulting, and energy-efficient technologies. Azolla complements our maritime intelligence tools by ensuring that shipowners adopt green fuel solutions, remain compliant with regulations, and optimize fuel efficiency. This integration allows a seamless transition to sustainable operations and mitigates operational risks.

Support Features

• Fuel Profiling and Emissions Tracking: We analyze the fleet's fuel consumption, carbon intensity, and efficiency, ensuring compliance with IMO, FuelEU Maritime, and other regulations.
• Regulation Alerts & Advisory Overlays: Receive real-time regulatory alerts and actionable insights to stay compliant with evolving environmental laws.
• Decision Dashboards for Compliant Routing & Port Operations: Our dashboards provide real-time insights on fuel usage, emissions, and compliance, empowering informed decision-making.
• Scenario Modeling: Compare different fuel-switching scenarios, costs, and regulatory impacts to make data-backed decisions that enhance ROI and ensure long-term sustainability.

The Bottom Line: Don’t Just Fuel Up. Fuel Smart.

Alternative fuels are more than just a compliance requirement - they’re a strategic advantage that directly impacts competitiveness in the global maritime industry. Embracing alternative fuels isn’t just about reducing carbon emissions; it’s about aligning your fleet with sustainability goals and making a positive contribution to the environment.

With 2025 fast approaching and regulatory pressures mounting, the time for action is now. Waiting for the perfect solution may delay progress, but taking steps today will ensure operations are future-ready, efficient, and compliant.

Reach out to explore how Azolla can help guide you toward smarter, sustainable fuel strategies and regulatory compliance, navigating the path to a greener, more competitive future for the shipping sector.

Frequently Asked Questions